Rhoden puts Fury in charge, blurring his break from Noem: Race Lab Signal
Gov. Larry Rhoden’s choice of longtime Noem-Rhoden operative Ian Fury as campaign manager signals continuity, not reset, as the Republican primary turns into a short June sprint.
Northern Plains News graphic.
Analysis by Todd Epp | Northern Plains News
Gov. Larry Rhoden’s decision to put Ian Fury in charge of his June primary campaign is not just a staffing note.
It is a political signal about what kind of race he thinks he needs to run - and what kind of Republican operation he is willing to own.
The campaign announced Monday that Fury will serve as campaign manager and Lexie Warejcka will serve as finance director for the June primary. The release also stressed Fury’s six-year run as communications director for both Rhoden and former Gov. Kristi Noem. Both are taking unpaid leave from state government to work on the campaign.
The signal in the hire
Campaign-manager hires are strategic tells. They show what a candidate values when the pressure gets real.
Rhoden had room here to send a different message. Since taking office, he has often come across as less abrasive than Noem and more open to ordinary give-and-take in public life. If he wanted to reinforce that contrast, this was a chance to do it. Instead, he elevated one of the clearest surviving links between his operation and Noem’s political apparatus, a point the campaign itself underscored by highlighting Fury’s service to both governors.
The choice does not prove Rhoden wants to run a carbon copy of a Noem campaign, but when forced to choose between visible distance and trusted continuity, he chose continuity.
Give us a news tip! Become a subscriber! Click on the link below:
Loyalty over contrast
There is a practical argument for that. Rhoden is heading into a short sprint to the June primary. A laid-back candidate may believe he needs a harder edge around him - tighter message discipline, faster response, more willingness to throw elbows. Fury may be in the job because Rhoden trusts him and thinks loyalty matters more right now than resume polish.
That explanation may even be right — and the hire still carries political risk.
Fury’s elevation also revives another issue: his difficult relationship with at least some of the state’s media. That alone will not decide a Republican primary. But it matters because Rhoden had spent his early stretch as governor signaling a more open and less combative posture than Noem. Putting a longtime Noem-Rhoden communications enforcer in charge of the campaign risks muddying that contrast.
The larger question for voters
Rhoden’s opening with some Republicans has rested in part on the idea that he is not simply Noem with a softer voice. Fury’s promotion complicates that argument. The campaign framed him as a longtime Rhoden-Noem insider, not as a fresh hand brought in to widen the circle or signal a new direction.
Reaction at South Dakota War College, which reposted the campaign release, suggests that reading is already out there among politically attentive Republicans. One commenter wrote that Fury was a weak pick who “still ties Larry to Kristi.” Another wrote, “Just when I thought Larry might be my pick, he pulls this blunder.” A third argued the move doubled down on keeping “Donald Trump and Kristi Noem’s leadership ON COURSE.”
Blog comments are not polling, and they are not proof of broad voter movement. But they do show the hire is politically legible in exactly the way Rhoden should worry about: as a sign that the Noem-era apparatus is still closer to the center of his campaign than some voters may have assumed.
For more background:
The Race Lab read
That is why this counts as a Race Lab Signal. The hire does not settle whether Fury will help or hurt Rhoden. What it does show is what Rhoden appears to value right now: the familiar over the fresh, message discipline over clean distance from the Noem era.
The question now is straightforward: Did Rhoden just hire the rapid-response enforcer he thinks he needs for a fast primary, or did he remind skeptical Republicans why they were looking for a post-Noem alternative in the first place?